Kidney Stones Or Labour More Painful?

Instructions for making a film about Paktofonice


Je-dy-dy-den, dy-dy-dy-two, trying to post, on each. The show about the script for the film is full "You are God" by Maciej Pisuka issued a series of guides, "Political Criticism" . Buy not bought, but borrowed read, can not bake reading went, but quite interesting.

This is not about the lengthy analysis, but it is worth noting that (1) scenario This film genre for the purpose of making the film. The scenarios should be sold in bookstores for a separate film directors. It's hard to have a very big laugh from reading the idea for the film. Nevertheless (2) free Pisuka arms when working imagination. You could then imagine a movie in its own way. This has the advantage that the artificial image is much greater chance of being good, than its possible real implementation (which scenario sincerely wish). And, of course, simply because that usually dominates the idea of \u200b\u200bimplementing it. Anyway: if you read the script it's best to sync the film in his head.

My film was not even cool, but little about the plots. Well, there are three guys are young, Jaraj to rhyming. One is already recognized (but the second, Rah, did not take up out of nowhere, after all, about the text is not a word, moreover, the characters are fairly shallow at all scratched, średniawka - say one or another of Pisuka scenes heroes), all have their problems associated with life in the capital of Upper Silesia, in blocks, with the girls, with the consequences of amorous ecstasy in fertile days, cwaniakami who do not unleash your finger from the pulse szołbiznesowej prosperity and have a great instinct for buying a sophisticated ability to teenagers in the pit to sell them at the top. To the suicide of one of them ... Okay, this is arcyinteresujący cord feature. Only that first little merit in its creation Pisuka (because it has the truth, nothing of the audience), and secondly in the book - released for smoke socially involved in publishing - I was waiting for a socially moral bearing. On the creation of an apology after all, or on the mammalian reflex criticism of the business, not stopping at nothing, what stinks potential hacks to do, despite the circumstances. I do not know, I'm confused KP logo on the cover simply guess. If it produced a normal person would have a capitalist economy relax while reading. And I was looking for the interpretation of the situation at the level of articulation and the leftist's great I do not fell, hence the slight annoyance at the end. (My impression is that much more important to reflect on the events comes from the rhyme PFK "recipes" Pokahontaz than this book.)

But I appreciate the art of marketing publisher: the book has caused quite a stir, read the title of appointments here and there. This is important for the brand. Even before When to worry about in a meeting with Szczuka and Żakowski if KP does not intend to endorse the ideological SLD, and yet a pleasant surprise: it's not KP is an ass, she is on the threshold of the Depression gracko closure on the back of the legend of a great album. Krytycznopolitycznych strategists estimate for development, which is a think-tank think-tank!

When Do You Get Lotiony Cervical Mucus

About how Dennett odczarowuje



"disenchantment" - TITLE I this is the latest book by Daniel Clement Dennett , released recently by the National Institute Publishing. At the inauguration of this blogotwórstwa promised you, and especially the yourself, a few words about it after reading. As I am from some time "shortly after", then write the following.

"disenchantment" promises much, and even a lot. Already subtitle - "Religion as a natural phenomenon" - betrays the author's broad ambitions, willing to explain the origin of religion from the Darwinian perspective. True, the author stipulates that the book does not report claims to present a complete, finite theory of religion as an environmental adaptation (and is rather just an invitation to take an interdisciplinary attempt to build such a theory), but its very evolutionary fis allowed to feed hope that we will have to deal with the text of the strukury different than a loud atheist manifestos by Dawkins , Hitschensa or Onfraya . Although Dennett is a philosopher, but it is very Anglo-Saxon philosopher. Buried in kognitywistyce, philosophy of mind and philosophy of science: Also in memetyce and - not least - in evolutionary biology. It's perfect for doing cognitive equipment to try to weave a theoretical outline of podtytularnej "religion as a natural phenomenon."

Is something made to measure such a profile? I have big doubts. Falls into the "disenchant" some interesting ideas that could serve as starting points for teoriotwórczej works, but I have a feeling, a significant part of the volume of text is another variant of the atheistic demonstrations. Manifestation is different from the above linked mainly due to the fact that not so violent, radical and militant. From a certain point of view (I reserve that is not my!) Could even see in this critical stonowaniu sizeable loads of empathy ideological, cultural, diplomatic tact and skill Dennett, if not the impression that it is simply a consequence of the inconsistency, the text was to be analytical, time after time, however, it crawls propagandistic intention. As it is dressed in a suit of scientific creativity, it must hold a theoretical smartness alone and do not dissipate after reading emotions. But to give you Dennettowi inclination to an agreement over the non-palatable divisions world view and understanding of the position pro-religion . The author wishes to enter into serious debate with religious people and makes sure that you do not feel bad in his company (such Dawkins, for example, it is evident in the nose).

smuggling propaganda in the text of a declaratory analytical - it is the first and most general sigh. Fuss szczegółowszych I have a few more (one of which found its perfect (no ba!) articulation in my commentary on the recipes of the "disenchantment" on the blog "unweaving rainbow" ), but I will not marudził too, because there is still undecided who to read for good discouraged, and would be a shame (despite the above remarks, "disenchantment" is an interesting and useful cognitive reading). If you do not forget (or rather not, because on some issues I'm terribly unforgiving) that I will drive one more pins in Dennett at the end of the text to the end there was too much Hollywood. And now let it happen only good things.

As I said, it's not hard to find in this book concepts (or rather the ideas of concepts) is interesting, intriguing and inspiring self-reflections on the lessons. The first one is this: according to Dennett the institution of religion is a fundamental adaptation of a late effect, namely, the intentional stance. It is characterized by each animal mind, if he treats some other parts of the world as

• operating facilities, which are
  
• limited beliefs the world
• specific desires and
• enough common sense to behave rationally these beliefs and desires. (p. 144)

Yes characterized intentional stance is pretty obvious biological explanation :

Every creature that moves, there must be something like a mind, which keeps her away from things dangerous for her and helps you find the good stuff , even the humble clam, unwilling to move off the place has one of the important features of the mind - avoids the danger of removing the shells of their food, "leg", it will alert whenever anything. Responds yes to any vibration or shock, which probably in most cases, nothing to be afraid, but the motto mussel better safe than sorry (involuntary reasons for its alarm system.) Ruchliwsze developed a method to distinguish the animals, in particular, they can divide detected invalid movements (like the rustling of leaves or rolling seaweed) and a potentially important - "Alive" or "biological" movements of another plant operated , other animal equipped with a mind, which may be a predator, prey, a partner or a rival from the same species. This is, of course, make economic sense. If you are afraid of any movement which detects, you'll never find dinner, and if you do not disturb the movements of dangerous, he will soon become someone's dinner. (p. 143)

little that we combine ourselves, it is also - in a section of the route to the summit of the evolutionary improbability - we started combine that combine or other objects around us. In itself, this does not have anything to do with the birth of religion, but this adaptation brings us (in any case, Dennett leads) to further clarify możebności zagwozdki: where it comes from the institution of the funeral?

our innate need to gain the intentional stance is so strong that we have serious difficulties with the exception of this attitude, it becomes something wrong. When a person dies that we love, or even just a well-known, we face the challenging task of cognitive updating: revision of all our habits of thought so as to meet the world in which there is no longer a system of intentional. (...) pain and confusion of thought, which we experience the loss of a loved one, is largely caused by a frequent, almost obsessive become aware that our habit of intentional attitudes haunt us with the mechanical persistence of the machine. We are not able to just delete the file records of our memory, and what's more, I do not want to be able to do so. Many of these habits is kept by the fact that succumbing to them makes us happy. Ponder them and us to them, anything goes, like a moth to a candle. (...)

However, there remains a problem: they are a potential source of disease, which meant that it developed in us a compensation mechanism for innate, strong repulsion , that keeps us away from the corpses. Attracted and repelled by the longing for an aversion to corpses beloved person, we fall into a state of deep anxiety. It is almost certain that this crisis has played an important role in the emergence of the world's religions. (pp. 146-147)

Thus, according to Dennett, as a result of evolutionary pressure from a very old man laid the groundwork for much later religious systems. The latter - pełnokrwiste understood as social institutions - have memetic pedigree, however its appearance would not be possible were it not for the specific interests of the adjustment. But before the first great-official religious-mandated community enjoys an intermediary between this and the other world - focused on the codification of the framework represented by each institution, a lot has happened. With the idea already underworld, the man began to manage it more efficiently. Aim clear: possible full implementation of the broad interest of cognition. So Dennett explains divination (which, apart from the cognitive function can be well explained pragmatically: if you do not have the possibility to make a rational decision in certain circumstances, and a choice you are doomed, simply for the control responsibility for that option to someone else, preferably someone from the assumption knows more and better, it is best to let them know everything!), so finally, the myth explains the evolutionary sense:

gems of folk wisdom for the whole world should think that a small knowledge is sometimes dangerous. Rarely noticed the application, which can be derived from this idea, is the court that sometimes it is safer to replace the incomplete knowledge of a powerful myth. (p. 198)

proposal that is defended in the "disenchant" bearing a quotation from the book Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity Roy Rappaport :

in the world (...) where the physical processes that govern its elements are somewhat unknown, and even more so unpredictable, empirical knowledge about these processes can not substitute faith in their more or less secret integrity, and perhaps more adaptive value of these processes is obscure veil of the supernatural than exposing them to the wrong understanding that płynęłoby of empirically accurate, but incomplete interpretation of the naturalistic. (p. 198)

Burial, omens, myths - it's all part of what Dennett calls the "folk religion" and differs from "organized religion." The first is simply a construct largely unconscious ("The same is done" based on iron and inalienable rights of natural selection). Organized religion is something that we face today, and so the product dense rozkminy on increasing the efficiency of the border between two worlds.

Had a whole "disenchantment" wanted to spin up after this and similar circuits to build explanatory (worse or better) hypotheses, it would be delicious. But, as I said, the lion's share of work is a reproduction of even the familiar tropes of "God imagined" versions of soft. I just read that about the difference between religious faith and scientific faith, a zapalniku conflict, which is ruled by religion and of the dangers of modern the disposal, of a responsibility system for their own ideological extremes, with the paradox of religious faith advertise through athletics to invoke the irrational (as in the mouth of an otherwise rational people have to have evidence of the power of the underworld - something like u scored a professor at Bauman poczynionym below for libel " Europe ") that nothing and no one deserves respect only of the fact that it is age or traditional, the lack of freedom of the children from the pervasive religious indoctrination, and the need to make choices based on the actual, full as possible knowledge of , etc. etc., you know what's patients. All of this, let me repeat once again, is given a very elegant and may have power to convince opponents. My "but" applies only to the fact that I was expecting a slightly different story on the topic (and again see the subtitle).

At the end of the protest supporter of the pro-animal philosophy and ethics to some detail of what this narrative. My impression is that Dennett is somewhat biased towards the environment under the sign of Animal Liberation. Writing about the "illusion of a fanatic," which defines as a "license to kill," he notes as follows:

(...) some people are simply thirst for blood, or strong emotions, and as our manners are becoming more civilized and nonviolent, in people growing desire to find those responsible, which will provide a "moral" justification for their bluster, this can be a "liberation" of laboratory animals (in which the subsequent fate of the activists have to get involved too), avenging Ruby Ridge by bomb in Oklahoma City, killing doctors who perform abortions, sending anthrax in the letters to "bad" officers federal, murdering innocent people under the guise of fatwas, the martyr's death in a jihad, or "settlement" (men armed to the teeth) in the West Bank. (p. 329)

Cited set of attitudes toward other people / animals inhumane looks as if he had used mental activities such as "which item does not fit within?" As our manners are becoming more civilized and nonviolent a sphere of human life are not subject to the process of civilizing and violence in it is not reduced. Speech, of course, a great branch of the global economy, which profits the production of meat and dairy products and other zoonoses. Dennettowi recommend film "Behind the Mask" , showing people where the government administrations per plain speak "ekoterroryści" (ai Dennett on the 381st "disenchantment" does not refrain from sticking to them that injurious patches) . Or read a book "Freedom for Animals" Ingrid Newkirk , "about the genesis and principles of operation Animal Liberation Front . The compilation of people who, under the principle of civil disobedience - Without causing anyone's death or physical injury? - Sabotaging the philosophical and economic order of our "more civilized" modernity person with the activity of exchanging arms for their own living someone else's ideas, it is unfair. Especially in the hands of someone who is by profession deals with the propagation of a rational overview of all things.

On the same line dowaliłbym still presented at the 209th the view that the farm animals gained more than lost their domestication (especially bearing in mind the fate of the modern high-yielding cow, pig, chicken and other "machines" to produce meat tissue, protein and other products of mass consumption), but certainly more than once occasion to find similar considerations in the future. Meanwhile, it makes no sense to do small things with narrative case for half the show. Once again (któren already?) Noting the considerable value of the cognitive whole, I conclude anything you write Christmas: When people begin to think critically, a system that "worked" for generations, may implodować from day to day. (p. 194)

Amen.

PS. The link interview with Dennett on wraży about the "rationalist"

Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia And Salt

religion "Europe" believe that people believe in God

Today's "Europa" deflects from the faith, specifically from faith to faith, more specifically, from faith to faith Editor Krasovsky in - of course of Mount question - the wisdom of the Nation as to ultimate issues. The editor of the editorial wonders title: "The success of the Vistula River God or just defeat his enemies?" true that lovely alternative? Nothing but nothing to celebrate unshakable thoughts from the subordination of Good Books.

is then himself, in half an extensive release, questionnaires, and her name "God and reason" .

We asked for the faith of liberal intellectuals, from conservative to leftist ostensibly to see what the intellectual tradition of victory in independent Poland. As the half-century of communism and two decades - apparently - so laicyzującej belonging to the West, it looks like the ratio of the Polish elite to religion . And what is it? turns out that the metaphysical anxiety of the Polish intelligentsia is the natural state of mind. Atheism, until recently fashionable belief that, apart from nature is not nothing that any of us ever wither like a leaf, and make sense of this process is not worth even investigate, in Poland is not accepted .

Oh, and fashionable, until recently, the belief that outside of nature there is nothing. Bier was the definition of the benefit of inventory (eventually anything that does not shed) and ask: when she was so fashionable? Is it correct editor-at times past? Even if among the, Lord have mercy Delusion, nomenklatura elite fashion for atheism was in fact widespread, it is what it has in common with the thinking of holding a philosophical position? But maybe try applied at this point, a handy category of conformism? Is conformity (understood not in Humanities and, as a biological adaptation, but I do not know whether it is fitting in "Europe" brandishing such vulgar language) does not explain more and better?

And when it comes to social reality after the end of '89 is the less I understand what the author wants to say. Because after my atheism, if you already pay for this worldview pełnokrwistego patch fashion is not fashionable until recently, but rather more recently. Okay, I do not find evidence of it in today's edition Yevropy. But look at the monthly łypiąc list of popular bestsellers attention is drawn to the fact that the most virulent Dawkins under the sun does not go with them since its Polish edition, and its great commercial success pushed the publisher of other books by Dawkins - the long time not seen on the market - to their resume. Only the "Blind Watchmaker" apparently went blind in Poland at the publisher and resume (with a coarse remark under the name of the author: "By God's imaginary" does not see it), but the allegrzaku price for the first edition has long shot into the empty sky transcendent.

Perhaps this is so that the anger Krasowski entire stock of "God phantom" and other buying Dawkinsów years, "Miller and Urban," but should also take into account the different możebność: so. new atheism is an offer and bought to be taken very seriously by the people of this land. While I understand that it is difficult to reconcile this, in turn, the possibility of the other elements of the body światoobrazu Krasowski, especially with such a flower here: promoted to the new faith of scientific knowledge has had a spectacular failure ; scientific mind proved unable to compete with religion and philosophy. Walks on the heights of metaphysical humanism conservative Krasovsky apparently lost contact with reality. But

but editorial editorials (thank you, Mr. Editor!), And the waiting time survey. And in the same sizeable caliber (as usual in Tygodnik EIN) names. In order of appearance in the columns: Holland, Singer, Sierakowski, Krzeminski, Huelle, Bielik-Robson, Bauman, Wodzinski, Chwin, King, Lagow. Just poczepiam of some of them, yet again
still too early to czepnę pożegnanego Editor. To him, I ask you, with the votes in the poll comes out that they were all in unison to affirm his version of the facts: Polish This intelligent animals suffering from chronic ailments religious, or at least metaphysical nature. That Chrzanowski, Gowin, George - it's well known, but it's not just enlightened wykładającym clearly a revelation. Krasowski is also deeply religious people in Sierakowski, Baum and Łagowskie, and for Bielik-Robson makes interpretation of the miracle uncovering deeply religious nature of the old Marx! Man begins to understand how the Editor express prejudice against science, it probably confuses you learn from the humanities, accustomed to the practice of interpretative tricks. Then turn the honor, learning to survive as obsolete, as he gave evidence najdowcipniejszy colleague Sokal.

Okay, jadymy with religion and reason in the interpretation of Polish intellectuals seeking to enter the arcane jaspersowskich in seventh heaven. Agnieszka Holland was hesitant, but with all these fluctuations from the child's own stunned me a radical and aggressive atheism - the belief that one can know for sure . Either I or her director, one of the two of us kuma not sure what is atheism. (There is also a third możebność: the laws of logic do not work at this level of discussion, which we will explain later, one of the invited respondents.) If I, as an atheist, entertained a similar belief, namely, that "one can know for sure," I would be stunned. And the discreet charm of the orders of language mixing in a single sentence (which comes, I feel the whole animating imagination intelektualistyczną
theological reflection of negative theology and the ontological proof of the head). What do we talk when we talk about certainty? It's about truth, which is a final and if the truth of life that make it easier in practice, so. life?

Co. wrote Pawel Spiewak, I know - of course "for sure" - and without reading what they wrote, so I gave a reading of his response. Similarly, I have sinned by omission of the two esteemed writers. Literature not read every day and on average I do not care what they have to say on the great feast. Well, even if the answer Stasiuk, or Masłowska or Podsiadło ... no because there's nothing Lem says, happily for Krasovsky probably.

good there, the singer is Sierakowski. To him I have nothing, everything is gites, his story is based on an intolerable fascination Badiou captivates me. But what he did with words Sierakowski editor, calling for the court before the tribunal of the lightest of Reason. But no time must suffice my personal decree: shoot!

Slawomir Sierakowski Polish intellectuals present themselves as older than the people who abused religion for all sorts of purposes, although they remained summer. Doing it just to the background Kolakowski, Adam Michnik and junior right-wing "followers sloterdijkowskiego cynicism" deliver their own profession of faith, fervent, and more authentic.

Krasowski editor-in is worth recalling that the respondents talk about "God and understand", not "faith and understanding." Is the distinction Krasowski these two orders? It seems that no distinction, and it shows him as the worst. Not because it not proper to make no distinction (although in fact, an intellectual would feel to discern, distinguish, even if being loved than being), but because he inadvertently reads the letter, which zawiaduje. Uprzedźmy accidents, Professor Bauman:

Faith is a wider concept than religion, which is a special faith in the existence of God. The concept of "faith" refers to any pre-loan trust, the certainty that something or someone does not disappoint us, that on something or someone we can rely on and that something will happen, as it must happen.

Consent? Agreed. How do I define my fervent belief Sierakowski? And yes:

faith is always defending certain principles in the name arbitrarily taken - and not the supposedly derived from the findings of expert - a decision on its merits. Otherwise it disappears ethical dimension of such a decision. Conversion to the faith is tantamount to political empowerment. There is no ethics without faith and politics is not without faith. Belief in God as the belief in a possible better future, in some respects is similar - it is faith in something that does not exist. Authentic faith is not applicable to the facts, but its unconditional ethical obligation.

Where's Kolakowski? Michnik Where? Where young right-wingers? Where the Crimea, Rome and where and what to gingerbread the windmill? If Sierakowski in this issue is to confirm our intuitions Krasovsky the current stage zmetafizyczenia Polish intellectual, then, verily, I say to you, all this confirms what the mountains and so on the first day of creation is known.

Then I did a Agata Bielik-Robson. I guess I stop to read it after this show. Not that I learned something interesting about her preferences metaphysical (read out since it is considered to stop reading, then you know what and how in this case), this is a leeched trumpets przysłowiowemu bear. This may Talmudic capacity prądkują Professor Singer and attack healthy organisms? And so, the methodology of hermeneutics she 's got a rotary in white-tailed eagles - what was indicated tutej somewhere before - the old Marx. Read, therefore, Mrs. Professor, when she reads a converted communist:

even in Marx's religion, especially the messianic, by which I meant here, appears as an important source of inspiration. Marx himself is remembered only that the "Contribution to Hegel's Philosophy law, "said his famous diagnosis:" Religion is the opium of the masses, "and forget that it is a sentence taken out of context, all of which is:" Religious action is an expression of real distress, is a protest against him. Religion is the sigh of the captive creatures, is the heart of a heartless world, the spirit of soulless age. "So, if religion is indeed the opium of the masses, it is only because it is the only store in the promise of higher happiness .

The professor will allow me to give faith (yes, yes, people who believe they are scientists, and even atheists , which provides Christmas "Quite." Only if "On" knows "for sure"?), The more his memory, though weak, than the interpretation ekwilibrystyce, but strong. Poor memory support with a quote from heavy book and check what it is removing from the context and what you insert into it. Biere in this paragraph with the following Marx quoted by Mrs professor (in another translation, sorry):

True happiness of the people requires the abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people. Require someone to abandon illusions about his situation that is required to abandon a situation which without illusions can not get away. The criticism of religion is therefore in embryo the criticism of that vale of tears, because religion is the halo of sanctity of this valley of tears.

Does this paragraph does not explain better what Marx has in mind when talking about the "opium of the people"? In my opinion, yes, definitely. Marx Religion is the opium of the people and it means exactly that people are truty opium and it's not cool. I remove words from the context under the guise of rebuilding the context zdestruowanego advance does not change anything in the "definitely" worth the faith opinion that Marx was not suppressed suppressed deep faith in religious faith. Amen.
Zygmunt Bauman
metafizyczy also the best:

The message of the Gospel can believe it or not. Leadership and logic have little to things here. The Gospel is full of the offending reason - and not about the resurrection, or the immaculate conception mostly goes, but a matter over which the scribes had to break your head in vain for centuries: how to reconcile the omnipotence and omniscience of God with panoszeniem evil, his goodness and agape with human misery and suffering? Such "absurd" a human niesamowystarczalności show, especially failure of the human mind (happening the things that the human mind can not comprehend, the things about which philosophers have not dreamed of ...) - and thus indirectly prove the existence of not only what the need, necessity, inevitability of God ...

Well, absurd (why the quotation marks?) Prove God's existence is not so much as its inevitability. At the same time "proving and logic have little to things here." And I still can not agree on such cardinal simplification and donation boxes for the loser of the dispute. And I ask: why a man of reason renounce the fundamental rational rozkminie znośności non-logical terms of all the machinery available to bring to reason? (Dennett in "disenchant" writes a few sentences
duties on "atletyzacji religious faith", I think that the case of Bauman is a good example of how this contraption works. But Dennett's appearance on the not yet.)

Finally Lagow, which took a Krasowski just enough to tell him everything is tallied, that is, that praised to the skies Marian devotion. Meanwhile:

in Poland will reduce the impact of religious belief. The weakening influence of religion can be seen even in the fact that today is not going for it is no dispute sharp, and is despite the fact that all television both private and public are the horns the propagandist of the Church and accept the position of this institution as a natural and not subject to questioning. On various occasions - such as the anniversary of the death or choice of the pope - is organizing a sort of collective madness, religious and moral. The Church has a parliament, provincial government, and - amazing - the university: there is no celebration academic zaczynałyby not from the mass. Universities voluntarily complied with the authority of the Church. This is not the result of exaltation emotional, but a manifestation of conformism and fear the new government. Church simply accustomed to the society that plays a major role, he has the final say in matters, which we assumed the part of the state. This subordination is, however artificial, superficial and does not involve deeper beliefs.

No, man pack, nothing but a classic conversion! Granted, Lagow too, as Krasowski, there was no atheists. But their lack of means Lagowski not sure about winning the war on the form of a forfeit heaven:

Postmodern mix of religious and political cynicism leads to the fact that an element of cynicism in the mix in time will prevail. Perhaps the same problems that occurred under the previous regime, which I call an atheistic theocracy. Communism has never been accepted as truth. He was not opposed arguments, because they do not deserve the substantive discussion. Has been undermined by cynicism - a space he had left behind, took just cynicism. It seems to me that even religion will not be fought in an open discussion - not least because it would first appear the believers in earnest, to be able to discuss with them. Position of the Church will not be fought in open battle for the arguments, but by the cynicism of a natural advantage over a fake faith.

It sounds unlike anything zgrzebnie a copy of a statement lead author: "When there is no religious people, overcomes cynicism", right? But will "certainly"?

(quoted from Marx's first volume of Marx and Engels Collected Works, Book and Knowledge, Warsaw 1960, p. 458th)

Grocery Delivery Calgary

Songs about control, not conspiracy theory.

word has been said, but has not yet issued, it was said, because it has not yet issued. Seem - How to ensure that Comrade Hubertini - February next year zero nine. I keep his word, what was said and zrymło and beat and scratches and prey okryło.

's performance on the boards of the team (the composition? Ensemble? Project? Yo! It is not easy in modern zoriencić postrokowej ultrarozrywkowej nomenclature and still young) Polaroid Android.

Publishing Title: Definitions. Without sucks: approaching the most important years in Poland, an event with the world lying at the crossroads of culture and politics. Radical culture and radical politics.

Polaroid Android is a product of hip-hop or a quasi-hip-hop, no need to of compliance. The material was subjected to examination by me fokusowemu. Familiar ziomy reacted differently, from enthusiasm to contempt. Enthusiasm correlated with involvement in the reception served in words the story, usually neglect took as a basis for aesthetic Foch at the so-called floł. Personally, hip-hop makes me, like, listen, I respect. I had the impression that a somewhat versed in the aesthetics, but perhaps it is so that it does not. Perhaps - perhaps totally - I have no ear, and I do not know what it floł. In any case, if indeed it is so that there is no rymowaniu Hubert floł, This totally does not bother me. And so that's probably because: (1) I know, like and respect Rymowicz and also sympathize with him, as well as (or "or") because (2) submit the form more than content with the obvious detriment of the personal skills of aesthetic perception of sensations (which is completely możebne in this case, since, I know, I have perceptual problems with the colors and the flavors in the culinary sense).

But that's not my disability was to be a show, but about control of songs here. However Before

grabbed the contents of the content word yet on the content form. Not
know therefore whether Polaroid Android is hip-hop and that Hubert has floł. Known for it - for the veracity of this knowledge I give up chlastać - that if, like me, you like shit in the music, dirt, noise, you should appreciate the efforts of artists. The whole bunch of sounds unnecessary, inefficient from the perspective of economics producenctwa mass music, pop culture powypieranych the margin is standard in this album. These are notes of deeply embedded in the tradition of punk rock, and industrailnej nojsowej rebellion (brass notes of Traka titled "Husbands" evoke memories
quite brilliant story from "Joggers and Smoggers" The Ex), But there are also those that irritate. Tease indeed - because I asked Hubert - intentionally. Scratches naive bezgłębne, too high pozgrywane begin the first issue under the title "I love Big Brother." The first transmission from the threshold of conscious rozkminy: take a think, step back, do not check this shit. This is fucked up, amateur. Nasrały them noobs. I do not even know how to do bitboks. I do not even know how to run skreczarkę. Fuck knows each other.

The coup followed, directed to a lyric. Home lyrical open access. Home lyrical on this album is the najsampierwsza other parties. In addition, however, that is, as above, plays a role in the opener to test further sounds, following one after the sounds, which - as mentioned above - odstręczają. And surprise here: 36 seconds "Big Brother" (From that moment in the history of plate, in which the party ensures that this lyrical, "a song about control, not conspiracy theory") sticks a bit heavy, scratches are no longer burn. It is well, dirty and oldskulowo. Then

differently. Okołohiphopowego lot of experimentation. That can love or not. I quite like it, though will be exactly like old-fashioned. But the creative expression does not condemn or even appreciate it. And to complete the first part of a performance dedicated to the band's music Adroid Polaroid.

then I go to the contents of the content. Here it is divine, here I feel satisfied almost finish (with a few exceptions from the finiteness of which I write below or not, I do not know.)

first I love Big Brother

another sleuth on the case wywęszy
to break the fetter me mad, it will be the first
with his nose to the ground in the official car
shooting arrest those who stand in the way
this train is going away and can not spin
me something in this world, pinches and squeezes
reflex of conscience without staring
fight for themselves about their place to the existence of

So begins the album. There is not much room for catching air, who wants to use must be prepared for a series of densely packed hardcore verses ( how the mechanisms of hardly anyone is curious, this truth is difficult to swallow even harder to digest ). Unfortunately, each is about. Unfortunately, there is no looser lines. It's not Eldo, Pezet no, not even Łona, it is a manifestation of acute pissed off that dobrało to their own bases, brought out the worlds behind them unaware. Unfortunately, the lyrical level is critical, critical and critical-political and social. In the city of Wroclaw, on the street Jagiello, from the yard climb up the secret kumplety rozsadniczego thinking that the target chooses Existing order, completely furnished zgrzebnie the mind of those who have nothing and have less and less.

When stationary outpost of the army still appears again on the battlefield - as amended, but still the same - go for voice of a new "General Ludd", which heats now allowed to destroy the machinery of consumption (115, 93).

New General and New zagrzewka, what this is about! That he again smells a dud? Quite possibly. But this alone is enough to ultimately choose the cynical side of reason? Truly I say to you, the better romp between the naive who are themselves (physically and mentally), and block move, than to settle between long time resident of the wise heads dupach that simply knowledge.

outpost of the above is not Hubert, and Debord. Who knows one and the other from the place itself They presented their side by side. The combination suggests itself when one hears the loudspeaker:

for breakfast lunch dinner show
buy the notion that life which I'll never have
buy because only about buying here referred
world dictatorship of the market traders policemen
live your life not a projection of the institution
a hidden dictatorship There will be no revolution
tired staring at the camera eye
bless you on your knees supermarkets
these huge temples Sunday stimuli

Inevitably, we have become - how long ago? - The actors do not necessarily willed performance. Actors and audience in one. ("Two in one" - the formula can not be overestimated from a marketing point of view!) Not everyone pushing for engagement / tickets, but we all załapali. Or rather, they caught. They were caught. The system is intrinsically closed, get out of it, stand next to and attempt to protest - it zakrawa the trick is not to implementation. Capitalism sucks rebellion patroszy of content and issue a shell for sale. Just like the joke about the Jewish anti-Semitic newspaper vendor: if each copy sold goes to his pocket per cent, in the end it is no longer an anti-Semitic. Economic development frees society from a natural compulsion of a direct struggle for survival, but society can not free himself from his liberator . (40, 47) This is the snag with the neoliberal form of things of this world: there are no alternatives to the dominant doctrine. The regime is holding up well and it remains widespread in the first place belief in the naturalness of the mechanism constituting the social system. Odfajkowywać remains assigned in advance (by whom?) Role in the story after the end of history:

not live your life this is the control
as far away from these questions so sweet carrot
and even if the world something pinches and squeezes
big brother thanks for the interview

second Winning the battle

trick, by which it gives to escape beyond the sham contestation contestation toward real can not go, almost certainly. The margin of error of this sad, cynical reason credited certainty based on faith. Belief that we can still become a nation - sovereign. bourgeoisie could seize power as a class of economic development. Proletariat to seize power, must become class consciousness . (88, 71)

world is sold and sleazy
inch by inch
seizing space
and I believe in you
in myself I believe in this war
for space in which a man
is a man still

All is not lost as long as you believe in me and I in you. This creeping plague of non-religious faith across the spectrum as jewropie. And while in Poznan Climate Summit noted alarming decline in direct-democratic sentiment (and I was not there too), it is still happening in the world and isolated on a true story, not quite post-. She is going on and solidifies. Perhaps it is not possible radical change in the system, perhaps just about weighing
social adjustment but who cares at the moment when we can count, and smell it? (We are everywhere "as the titulary the first book, is truly capture and Embody the exuberant creativity and radical intellect of the protest movements opposing neoliberalism around the world ). In the war of man against wypłukującemu content of interpersonal relations system should be resistant. Music can be zajebistym resistor. They knew the guys from seein 'Red , they know it and buzz hoppers with Polaroid Android:

microphone is also a weapon in the war for our space
everything is alive in us
it is not easy and pleasant light
as the words that fall from the sky on the wind
people are dropping bombs on the line
we are not dependent on public opinion
when life is hard as your old siaty
in a supermarket filled with merchandise
diverted the world if the world was a commodity product
that shit under a huge banner *

Here, too, talking about Polaroid Android Debord, Vienna or unconsciously: The play is the stage total subordination of all the goods of social life. Not only that commodification has become apparent, it is not seen nothing outside of it, the visible world is a world commodity. Dictatorial power of modern economic production expands and strengthens . (42, p. 48) is the constant spectacle Opium War of equating wealth with the goods, and meet the needs of survival, which extends under its own laws. Survival - as the object of consumption - and has continued to expand, because still associated with poverty. There is no afterlife extended survival, no point at which it could terminate its development: it can indeed enrich
misery, but it can not overcome. (44, 49) and hence the kurwica at Christmas żantach, teskach and kerfurach. Consumers growing practical metaphysics: the more draws, the more wishes, multiplying my misery. Trap almost hopeless, because the system is, as I put above, it is almost closed and the power of blind swings instynkyu virtuous, and its computational power has long since outgrown the brains of the best theorists najtęższych
economic regimes. Any fanatic of evolution knows that "knows better choice." Is not the same thing happens to us - of course a natural! - The basis of neo-liberal hegemony? Blog acceptance of what exists, it may take the form of a purely spectacular rebellion: the same hollowness has become a commodity because, since economic abundance, expanding its production, has learned to manipulate this type of material (59, 55).

4th Freedom of speech

Here Hubert, in turn, cultivates rozkminę the line Chantal Mouffe. Read? I do not know, irrelevant. Public dożynanie Isolation laughter or ideological heretics, apostates from the neoliberal natural law works regardless of awareness of this mechanism. And this is so:

democracy freedom of speech freedom of speech

democracy freedom of expression, democracy
I typing in the convention
for all a cop and now it is safer
I have my banner, and I feel great
even have anyone to sell their brenie
I marched around City Hall
not break the law until all have fun
I say what I want as long as no one wants to listen to me

depreciated the seriousness of this heresy, and usually the most effective najpierwszy way of eliminating the social, political or ideological significance. Denying racjom weight not because they are simply irrational, but because they do not respect the rules of the First Discourse Participation in the universal: do not do anything contrary to the natural of Good absolute. In the best case traciłbyś time, at worst you could do harm. Ahistorical Good is a patient. (Until the time.)

5th Husbands

rhymes Cherry. History on sexual exploitation and the daily violence of patriarchy. Told very firmly and very bluntly.

powder and what is hiding underneath the traces
your husband's passing left a deep down the middle
between work at the dinner table with a full stomach
the absolute social acceptance
safe attitude
acquiescence gives an honest and righteous neighbor
zarzyganym each block from wroclaw to warsaw
in Poland where vodka god belief in god addiction
a Sunday chicken soup for the spiritual nourishment of cities mustaches
he says that this has been brought up
may be just stupid and not selfish
you also told your mom
you truly fun filled square
church kitchen, children's bed
because every girl needs to be well behaved
you love or like a fish stranded on the beach
die quietly and do what he tells you
you your husband he is zaślubiony
enter the plate clean plate when he is tired of
and what that drink bad beats to live
not waste time on the consciousness that it can kill you faster
this life is the social role of wife
such wives are many and the world zarobaczony

This is an important story and, therefore, that all too often I have a dodgy pleasure to be in the company of ladies and their modernych men (or vice versa), perorujących on feminist hysteria. Their husbands do not beat them, they cook them, is equality. So why is skrzekliwe baby in the media? These niedoruchane rewolucjonistki? That's how it alienates elegantly rising dawn native Polish middle class from the poorer everyday and for all the local working class.

(Interesting things are happening in addition to the background in the music. Definitely the brightest spot reads experimental Polaroid Android.)

7th war with the city

signal to march, convert theory into practice . Odwojować city, let the return will be ours. call us citizens, excessive courtesy. The role of the citizen's role in the election celebrysty urn. In the meantime, we meet by consuming and did not ask about irrelevant issues, including among others: why is reduced from one year to the socially valuable space? From whom the idea of \u200b\u200bfencing, fencing, exclusion from the public over the subsequent quarters? Who gave the area of \u200b\u200bmarket towns in the possession of propaganda? Where there are still places free of ads? Who benefits from homes with glass and steel, which finally, after so many years of utopian dreams, but grow in the hearts of cities? Whose city? Whom do they serve? Who is responsible for their shape and content? Not very unclear to whom these questions are addressed at all, so

go to war war with the city
overturn everything on the left side

8th Definitions

punch line follows. All had previously been a call for the redefined, with open minds and attempt to set the blocks into new configurations, in a joyous act of creativity,
prospects in donating a brand new view of everything that is important. Another world is possible. This is another treat, this time quite explicitly expressed call to take (unfortunately, the already existing warunach quite heroic, however, whore) try yourself, consciously reconstructing identities based on social context and, of course, on the contrary, the context based on the identity of .
I am glad that the first album is called Polaroid Android as it is called, and that last song is a song last. Of course you can listen to the so-called circle. But in case anyone - CAREFULLY! - Zamiarował make a one-time listening, it is only with such wyartykułowanym "goodbye!" By the way is another strong song on the control function and entertainment business, this is never enough to remind young people:

act of creation is just
production and sales promotion will
institution with its branches all over the world
Seek and ye shall find Seek and ye shall find
certainly fulfill the great task
consumer knocks on my knees
conquer your heart is an army of managers
marketing whizzes and management
schools effectively teach orientation
in maps of neoliberal democracy
new identity and history of ethics
trendy music entertainment industry
it is like a panacea for your
frustrations are put to sleep your anger inhibits the interactions
and effectively drowns out the awareness of failure
see for yourself how little you need to
to be happy
indeed what it is today
they can explain exactly

unless someone else creates definitions
love freedom work life happiness
is that you give to these words, the importance of
ask yourself, ask yourself
you have control over your life
spiritual non-existence of material existence
whether or not you you or are you or not you

___________________________
*) Hubert on this stanza per website: "It is Fristajl Roszji / z Roszja and Lu / on the disc to give any notice also group of KZK and Noisegarden / first two lines are mine / and it has developed a "

$ $ $

On board are two stories more than the above. One has a simple text instead of real rhyme poem. This poem is about Wroclaw.
second is a public record of text reading John Cage Overpopulation and Art .

Both stories are more important and completely on the spot, while I I do not feel on the spot to write especially about the first one. The other could ever happen to me write when he read a whole and I decide that I would write something. I doubt that to happen (because I'm reading to be done and without that eventuality so that probably you will have no life), but who can know for sure.

PA plate, as I wrote, to be published in the 02.09 effort combined forces antennas and Scream QulturRapu . On the day of release [which is the deca and delayed due out this month, wait - ed. March 1] the material will also be available on the site Open Music . For nothing. Polaroid Android
can listen the Last.fm and (in lower quality sound) on MySpace . Another
recka board to read the blog DEWAST . Citations
Society Guy Debord performance in the translation of Matthew pints per linkowanym this release. The first number in parentheses after each citation is the number of passage, the second - the page number. Quote
in a foreign language comes from the introduction to the book Naomi Klein We Are Everywhere .
address wzmiankowanego Cage: John Cage
, Overpopulation and Art, ed. Andrew Sosnowski, World Literature No. 01-02/1996 (294-295), p. 179-203.

Hydrofoils And Wakeboarding

it is written ...

cool fun to read blogs. Equally fun is planned to start her own. Truly I say to you, I know what I write, the latter axiom I actively cultivate more than just reading blogs. Because this, I ask you, is still something reads, hears, sees, the central resort still had the input and the output is often produced some - it is that pre interesting not only for myself, I checked experimentally - ideas.

doctorate has not defend me in this life (cord while what is still open, and the openness of its forces momentary remorse that he has not complied with) and sometimes you want to write. Thus, there is nothing in the infinity brandzlować pro-societal (or whatever cosmopolitan) potency of cyber-networks. It is high time to join the horizontal and still leveling up the space of a vibrant culture - the free market exchange of ideas.

Bloggerki Sisters and Brothers Bloggers, I come! Piąteczki raczcie poprzybijać! Społem odmienimy face of this earth! The joint efforts of all the departments of cultures and arts centers overturn let the spin, and let the vertical poured on the power - on the Destruction to koteriom dark and enlightened populace to delight!

(By the way, and yet passing excess that the immediate impulse to bring the first character in this post was made before the time of reading the fresh entry in his blog killy'ego unweaving rainbow - there are recipes you is the announcement of Dennettowego "disenchantment" which Killy - as I - in the course of reading it seems, being enchanted. I will not be worse, it announced: just let him (once there) and will inevitably end up burning lekturkie opinion. Especially since Michael in so far refused to cooperate with the readers.)

PS. W / the guys by the way, thank you and best regards! ;-)